Intelligent objects versus unhappy objects
November 15, 2004
Interesting metaphor for ubiquitous computing posted by Bill Grosso in the Future Salon blog: Unhappy objects:
Every now and then, wild-eyed visionaries start talking about artificial intelligence and what could happen when objects get intelligent. But artificial intelligence is hard, and solves problems that don't need to be solved.In particular, I don't give a fig for intelligent objects. I don't want my stuff to be intelligent. I just want my stuff to be unhappy.
Why? Here's an example. I just spent 15 minutes walking around my house trying to find my coffee cup. It turned out to be behind the rice cooker.
Suppose my coffee cup had a sensor in the bottom, a battery in the handle, and the knowledge that if it starts out full of hot liquid and winds up, 4 hours later, full of cold liquid, it should be deeply unhappy and attempt to complain loudly and vociferously.
We could have an RFID-based system running in the house that looks for all the unhappy objects.
More generally, if my objects had a notion of home (or if the system had a notion of home), wouldn't life be wonderful. Suppose I could tell my house: the date/calendar book should be near the suitcase. And the suitcase should be in the bookcase near the front door.
And when I can't find the suitcase, it could find it. And when I ask it about the unhappy objects, it could say "Dude. You left the suitcase in the bathroom, under the sink again."
I'm serious. I don't really care much for Wal-mart's inventory problems. RFID could solve my inventory problems.
(via Simon in the comments of Nätverkssamhället)
Posted by andersja